INTERAKSI KAUSALITAS BERSYARAT ANTARA PENYELARASAN INFORMASI AKUNTANSI-STRATEGI, KOMPLEKSITAS PENGENDALIAN INTERN, ORIENTASI BIAYA STRATEGIS, DAN KEUNGGULAN EFISIENSI OPERASIONAL

Authors

  • Andi Primafira Bumandava Eka STIE Manajemen Bisnis Indonesia
  • Nurmawati Mambuhu Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk
  • Dipa Teruna Awaludin Universitas Nasional
  • Muklis Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Aprih Santoso Universitas Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55122/jabisi.v7i2.2365

Keywords:

Penyelarasan Akuntansi, Pengendalian Intern, Orientasi Biaya, Efisiensi Operasional

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan kausal bersyarat antara penyelarasan informasi akuntansi-strategi, kompleksitas pengendalian intern, orientasi biaya strategis, dan keunggulan efisiensi operasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei. Populasi penelitian terdiri atas manajer keuangan, manajer operasional, dan staf akuntansi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2023–2025. Sampel dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan jumlah 216 responden. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan metode Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) dengan pendekatan moderasi dan mediasi bersyarat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelarasan informasi akuntansi dan strategi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap efisiensi operasional. Kompleksitas pengendalian intern berperan sebagai variabel moderasi yang memperkuat hubungan tersebut, sedangkan orientasi biaya strategis berperan sebagai variabel mediasi parsial. Hubungan kausal ini bersifat bersyarat, yaitu pengaruh penyelarasan informasi akuntansi-strategi terhadap efisiensi operasional menjadi lebih kuat ketika kompleksitas pengendalian intern berada pada tingkat yang memadai dan orientasi biaya strategis diterapkan secara konsisten.

References

Anderson, S. W., & Lanen, W. N. (2002). Exploring the past, present, and future of management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2002.14.1.1

Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7–8), 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00045-3

Bouwens, J., & Abernethy, M. A. (2000). The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 221–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-4

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00038-6

Chenhall, R. H. (2005). Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.04.003

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Davila, A. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management accounting systems in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4–5), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00039-3

Feltham, G. A., & Xie, J. (1994). Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal-agent relations. The Accounting Review, 69(3), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1994.69.3.429

Ghazalat, A., Mansour, A. Z., Alkhasawneh, S., & Alhmood, M. A. (2025). Investigating the effect of contingent factors on performance of SMEs: The mediating role of management accounting system. Journal of Management & Organization, 44(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/01672533251317072

Ghasemi, R., Azmi Mohamad, N., & Karami, M. (2016). The mediating effect of management accounting system on the relationship between competition and managerial performance. International Journal of Accounting Information and Management, 24(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2015-0023

Gow, I. D., Larcker, D. F., & Reiss, P. C. (2016). Causal inference in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 477–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12119

Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2022). The Routledge Companion to Auditing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141510

Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2022). A measure of firm complexity: Data and code. Journal of Information Systems, 36(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISYS-2021-041

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 349–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-3

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2009). Coming up short on governance. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01672533251317072

Kren, L. (1997). The role of accounting information in organizational control: The state of the art. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.1997.9.1.313

Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00027-1

Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007). Management accounting systems, strategic positioning, and performance in hospitals. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(3), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00427.x

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-1

Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic Cost Management: The New Tool for Competitive Advantage. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.1994.6.1.147

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.347

Van der Stede, W. A. (2000). The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack and managerial short-termism. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.293

Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001

Wijaya, A., & Soepriyanto, G. (2023). Pengaruh sistem informasi akuntansi terhadap efisiensi operasional dengan pengendalian intern sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 20(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2023.03

Zimmerman, J. L. (2001). Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-5

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Primafira Bumandava Eka, A., Mambuhu, N., Teruna Awaludin, D., Muklis, & Santoso, A. (2026). INTERAKSI KAUSALITAS BERSYARAT ANTARA PENYELARASAN INFORMASI AKUNTANSI-STRATEGI, KOMPLEKSITAS PENGENDALIAN INTERN, ORIENTASI BIAYA STRATEGIS, DAN KEUNGGULAN EFISIENSI OPERASIONAL. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia (JABISI), 7(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.55122/jabisi.v7i2.2365